Profit by site, once the overheads are carried.
Your commissary, your warehouse and your head office cost real money and sell nothing. Share that across the sites they serve and see which ones genuinely earn their place.
| Head office salaries | driver: headcount | ₱1,840,000 | |
| Rent — shared floors | driver: floor area | ₱620,000 | |
| Commissary | driver: kilos issued | ₱402,610 | |
| Delivery fleet | driver: drops | ₱288,400 | |
| Systems & licences | driver: users | ₱96,000 | |
| Total to spread | across 6 outlets | ₱3,247,010 |
A cost allocation engine with five bases, effective-dated rules you change yourself, and a proof that reconciles to zero every period.
What it actually does.
Five bases, and the right one per cost
Revenue, an equal share, headcount, floor area or covers. A commissary is not shared the same way as head office, and forcing both onto one basis is how an allocation becomes an argument instead of an answer.
- Set per cost and per period, changed by you without us.
- Effective-dated — a rule dated from today allocates nothing to an earlier month.
- Unmeasured floor area is null, not zero, so it cannot silently absorb cost.
Two sites make money on their own costs and lose it once they carry their share. That is the whole reason this page exists.
It reconciles, or it says why
Allocated out and allocated in agree to the centavo every period. When they do not, the screen names the cost that is not covered by any rule rather than quietly balancing.
- A proof you can show an auditor, run at the moment you open it.
- Every share opens its driver, its rule and the rows it was computed from.
- Nothing is posted by the allocation — it is a reading of the books, not a change to them.
The last line is the check. An allocation that does not reconcile to zero has quietly lost money somewhere.
The number that decides things
Profit by site as posted, beside profit by site after it carries its share. Two sites that look profitable on their own costs often stop looking profitable the moment the kitchen is paid for.
- Compare a period against the one before it, on the same rules.
- Change a basis and see what it does before you commit to it.
- A policy, not a project — it was always meant to be yours.
The ones people ask about this.
Why is an earlier month showing zero allocated?
Because the rule is dated from later than that month. Rules are effective-dated on purpose, so history cannot silently change under you — set the rule’s start date to the period you mean.
Does it post journals?
No. It is a reading of the posted books, which is what lets you change a basis and look again without a trail of adjusting entries behind you.
Can different costs use different bases?
That is the point. A commissary might be shared on covers, head office on revenue, and rent on floor area — each defensible, each set separately.
Who can change the rules?
Whoever you give the permission to. It is a setting, not a change request, and every change is recorded against the person who made it.
Nothing here is a separate product.
Accounting
Multi-entity double-entry, consolidation, intercompany
See the pageReporting & analytics
155 reports, each opening the rows behind it
See the pageProduction
Recipes, bills of material, yield, batch runs, wastage
See the pageInventory
FIFO cost layers, batches, expiry, multi-site, counts
See the pageSee it on your own figures.
Bring one ordinary day from your business and we will run it through in front of you, on your own items and your own prices.